All posts by ester

boston, i’ve heard, is the same climate as copenhagen so i guess this is good preparation. some nice walking today, all of us in different bright-bold colored hats: becca red, ben purple (an adapted neckwarmer), me green. it took us a while to get going. before we left this morning we had to discuss veganism in depth with becca’s mother and think much about what we were going to do and when. ultimately we decided we would wander around harvard square — once cool, now yuppie, like so many places — see gosford park, dine, and meet rabi in a coffee shop in davis square. that all went as planned. first we sat on the floor with books in Wordsworth, which is one of my favorite things to do. i read through the first forty pages of dave egger’s Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius. i’ve been meaning to do that for ages. i didn’t buy it — i couldn’t — i brought five or six books with me and have been eyeing all of becca’s in addition — but i enjoyed it.

the film lived up to expectations. it’s witty and graceful although it involves too many characters to keep straight and has too many guns on the wall. quite admirable that altman pulled it off. certainly great performances all around. for some reason it drained my companions and it wasn’t until after dinner at the do-gooding Veggie Planet that they regained good spirits. rabi’s presence at the Someday Cafe thereafter also helped. new blood, you know.

i think i’m finally ready to make my top ten list. bearing in mind i’ve yet to see mulholland drive, in the bedroom or waking life, i hereby submit, in no particular order:

gosford park; amelie; bread and tulips; hedwig and the angry inch; lord of the rings; the royal tenenbaums; the man who wasn’t there; memento; in the mood for love; and, my favorite, princess and the warrior.

i’m sure all of you are thrilled. anyway if i’ve forgotten something let me know.

in the computer lab at commonwealth, becca’s high skool. she’s elsewhere enjoying her reunion. i’ll probably catch up w/ her but after several hours of being in the company of strangers, albeit nice ones, on three hours of sleep (9 a.m. to noon) when i saw a computer i dove for it.

yesterday ben and i made the spontaneous/impulsive decision to train it up to boston where (swat)becca lives. the cheapest fares were either last nite or tomorrow and we decided to just go. my father took some convincing — look, danny!, i mentioned my family, and look! danny, i’ve mentioned you! — (danny, my brother’s friend, who read thru this entire site one day while bored at work) — and in his distraction at my going he lost two credit cards. undeterred, ben and i said our goodbyes, packed, and made it to a 9:25 train assuming we could sleep between then and 6:35 a.m., when it was to arrive in boston. i should have made like ben and downed some nyquil in preparation but i did not and so only snatched little now and thens of sleep. for the most part, i sat and swayed with the train, feeling too braindead to pick up one of the five books i brought with me for that very occasion, my cd player, or my notebook. consequently, i made it a few key hours this morning — enough to get in to the station and make it to becca’s house, and even exchange pleasantries with her mother — before collapsing in her bed.

since, she’s taken ben and me on a brief introductory tour of cambridge and boston; we’ve met up with her friends, drunk tea, sat in a hotel, and our now supposed to be partying. i’m too frayed and muddled still to be witty or attractive or engaging so i don’t feel like exposing myself to people. at the risk of being seen as becca’s antisocial friend from swarthmore (when will i stop caring what other people think, i wonder) i’m going to find a nice corner to curl up in and read.

i miss my friends a little, which is silly considering i was just with them [you] for a week. seeing other people reuniting in a high skool setting inevitably brings back memories. i drifted at some point slightly from some of the people who helped bear me through that ordeal. how? why? is it better this way? is there anything i can do? is it worth even thinking about?

my fingers are still cold from spending the day outside. well, the day post– a second showing of rings which ben hadn’t seen. he suggested we hop to over breakfast at 11:40; we found that it was playing at the Uptown, a classic old movie theater, at 12; so off we went, making it with only minutes to spare. i called it impulsive but that got euphemismed “spontaneous”. why ‘impulsive’ is more insulting i don’t know.

at any rate, he enjoyed it and even a second time through, i didn’t find it overlong and the photography was, if anything, more beautiful. i very much admire a director who can go virtually the entire movie without lingering on a horizontal axis. i guess keeping the camera moving is one trick to keep the film moving too.

we picked up cheap, excellent pizza at Vace’s, an italian deli were my mom buys dough, and tracing the path lana jay and i trod countless times over the summer we walked down to dupont circle. i narrated as we went:

… the zoo where i spent the summer when i was sixteen, volunteering in the greenhouse with a little person engaged to another little person (he would pick her up in a red car specially made to accomodate him); a harmless, mentally ill man from a rich family who’d been working there for years; an elderly lady for who liked working with the flowers; and toni, my skinny, chain-smoking boss who got a wandering eye from a car accident that landed her in a coma for six weeks after her husband of twelve years informed her he’d been sleeping with their mutual best friend for a year. she was only slightly bitter; they continued to live together after the divorce. she told great stories. i rode in the back of a pickup truck for the first time that summer and if you go to the small mammal house or the elephant house, you will see trees in the planters that i installed myself.

… the chinese embassy where i arrived after a march in paper chains from the white house with jay, winter, tenth grade. i’d been wondering how to get his attention and settled on this route, which ended with me standing, up to my shins in snow shouting “Free Tibet!” at the brick walls

… calvert street, where i worked last summer at wifp and got heckled frequently for having the audacity to walk to the corner

and so on. we stopped at Second Story which was having a 20% off sale. he picked up blues records; i found a copy of Gentlemen Prefer Blondes and a book by ntozake shange, the author of for colored girls…. then we metroed to friendship heights for more book shopping so he could make good use of a $50 gift certificate to an evil corporate conglomerate. now home. it was a red-cheeked loose-hair day. i liked it.

happy new year. 2002 huh. hey, a palindrome! that’s nice. i can’t really imagine a year topping last year for me. for the country, yeah, quite possible; for the world, certainly. but i had a great year last year. i’m kinda sorry (and i know i’m probably the only one) to see it go.

watched the ball drop with very little ceremony at lana‘s house. liz jay ben and i arrived together at 7 and found the house laid out nicely in preparation for smore-making, sushimaking, snacking, trivia-sign-making (a laone of our barn parties: we had everyone write a little known fact about themselves and post it up on the wall) and general revelry. the first three/four hours were excellent: a few more people came, good moods all around, laughing, talking. ben nursed a fire. we lit a thousand or so candles around the place. much fun. then people i didn’t really know came and some people left and there were a few low spots. we watched eddie izzard’s glorious which is funny but not as good as his HBO special. then it was 5 a.m.

we’d planned a game: a throwback to post-highskool bonding in which everyone takes turns typing up their answers to some questions (like, What do you want to be when you grow up? and Who would play you in the movie of your life?), then prints out their answers and puts them in a bowl. then the bowl is passed around a circle and each person fishes out an answer, reads it aloud, and the group tries to match the answer with the person who supplied it. it went allright except that people kept coming and going during it so some of the people to whom answers were attributed weren’t there to confirm or deny.

the past couple days have been fun in general though. mostly we’ve just chilled. ben’s been immersing himself in Harry Potter III. … it was a good year. i can’t believe i’m spending the first half of the next one in copenhagen.

about to go to brunch at my grandparents’, only, this being my family, naturally we’re running late. last nite what i thought was just a matriarch-patriarch-brood dinner turned out to be a matriarch-patriarch-brood + friends-relatives-and-wellwishers surprise event for my parents’ 25th anniversary. held at la ferme, a fancy french place to which i hadn’t been since lisa’s batmitzvah ohsomany years ago. the kids all had disposable cameras on their tables and i took a picture of geoff looking soulfully into someone else’s eyes — i don’t even remember who now — but he tracked me down, grabbed the camera, pulled the roll of film out and tore it apart. emotions ran high in middle skool.

this being my family, everyone was running around taking pictures last nite. as the centerpiece of the evening was a science-fair type display board covered w/ photos from the last 25 years, it seemed both appropriate and redundant. to me, both my parents look better older which is rather odd. my mother takes excellent care of herself and she really is lovely, although she’s never believed that.

the banquet lasted 3 and a half hours after which i was just too tired to do anything else. liz and i had spent the afternoon cheering each other up, pawing thru Second Story, buying $7 worth of diet soda at Giant, and eating no pudge w/ alexandra. after that excitement, cosmic bowling would have been plain anticlimactic. ended up having a fun conversation w/ the fella and reading some more of quixote. i complained to my father that i was tired of reading depressive lit and he threw that at me.

after the passionate, wholehearted excitement that was wednesday through thursday, it’s understandable that friday came with a little bit of a let down. after all, how can you top oatmeal sponges and “you a dyke baby! dyke baby! maybe you grow up to be — P.E. teacher!”? i mean, really. but yesterday did have its perks: amelie w/ tamar, her friend brett from skool, and johnny, who is in the final stretch college-admissions wise and looked even broader than i remembered him. the film itself was charming and lovely. my only complaint is a strange, general one which is that i wish more women made films. film and media are such strong influences on audiences particularly in america but surely in other countries as well and nearly all movies or t.v. show you see — even the ones supposedly about women — are produced, directed, and/or written by men.

of course that’s not necessarily bad. it’s just that no one stops to think about the fact that what they’re being constantly exposed to are men’s ideas/ideals/portrayals of women.

later in the evening, lana and jay swung by. we watched bottle rocket w/ my cousins and hopped from room to room talking. today everything’s still up in the air. maybe reading: i picked out four books — one i’m half through, one i’ve yet to start, one i’ve started, and one i loved and could reread. it’s cloudy and cold outside (how am i going to handle scandinavia?). i’m cocooned in fleece. could call ross in wanakena, where he’s hopefully-happily reunited w/ his girlfriend. for the past semester she’s been living in buddhist monasteries in japan.

more pics:

this of (from top, L –> R) liz, lana, annie/ (bottom) me, jamie:

my bday party

and this of (L –> R) jamie, me, becca, lana. in philly. and ain’t it gorgeous?

fall in filly

so as per more than one request, i hereby provide the information that the quote on my heading is from the e.f.o. song bleecker to broadway and i kinda got it wrong (oops). the actual thing, which i will swiftly correct, is, “some seem to think i’m neurotic but i’m not — i just like to think about things over and over and over and over again.” good stuff. and hey, did you know that bela fleck plays the banjo on that album? yeah, you bet.

it’s been a fun couple of days. after meeting tamar and nomi for a two-hour long excellent yuppie lunch where we discussed taboo topics (sex, religion, margaret cho) at oblivious teenager volume, we argued over whose house to go to to make the cookies. first one, then another; then shopping, quarreling throughout about what to put in the cookies. raisins/craisins? cloves/chocolate chips? ultimately at nomi’s we, joined by liz, made oatmeal cookies via instructions on the Quaker canister, only substituting applesauce for margarine and foregoing the sugar b/c apples are sweet, right? tamar and lana, whose curiosity was prodding them, used instant apple-cinnamon oatmeal, formed their batter into one heart-shaped cookie and baked it in the toaster oven.

needless to say, everyone’s came out pretty badly. ours tasted spongy except for the parts blessedly marked by chocolate chips (at least we had the presence of mind to throw those in.) tamar and lana’s apple-cinnamon instant oatmeal toaster cookie was absolutely inedible but they munched through it staunchy regardless. then we watched hedwig, without a doubt one of the best queer-themed movie i’ve ever seen and one of the best films i’ve seen this year. made me happy. thereafter darling rick and yoni, who just got a prestigious internship at the washington post for the summer and who is tripping off to india in a couple weeks — assuming india’s still around then — joined us. now if only sccs would start working again, my life would be fuzzny …

still over at lana’s (to whom i’d link only the blog she just set up isn’t appearing and whose other blog she can’t access. i wonder if blogger’s being difficult or if this is a test of her resolve.) we had granola bars for breakfast so i can still taste the Chewy-ness and for some reason we’re listening to classical music. i think she must have put her setlist to random. six hours of sleep — god it’s like being back at college. we stayed up scanning pictures and putzing around on the net after liz, liz’s sister alexandra, and ari, who, with his new haircut and a tie that he had swept around his neck like a cape, looked like prince charming, left. we had watched margaret cho’s i’m the one that i want and laughed our asses off and sat around the kitchen table telling stories like giddy old women.

pre-lana’s, we were over at annie’s enjoying colin firth and comforting her for having bought self-rising flour which produced, just as her mother warned, puffy pasta when she boiled it. that stuff’s only good for baking cookies, said her mother; and lo and behold this morning tamar suggested we come over and bake cookies. we’re heading over there in a minute. yesterday was all fun; i’m hoping for more of the same. irritatingly sccs won’t let me into my email account — what’s up with that? sorelle? elizabeth? sysadmins?

last nite trying to teach lana to make links, i kept going thru the formula with her. she typed “target” and “new” and then paused, unsure of how to connect the two. “what would annie say?” i prompted. “equals!” she squealed and typed it in. 🙂 she’s set. and i-so-clever

okay chinese dinner followed by royal tenenbaums. i enjoyed the movie while in the theater but on the ride home my family debated, derided, and eventually declared it dumb. i’m so used to seeing things by myself at this point and forming opinions untouched by theirs — now i’m not sure what i think. i can’t tell if i’ve been swayed. in any event i can honestly say, i enjoyed it at the time.

got home, talked briefly to lana, lonely all by herself in rockvile, and ended up getting in an extensive conversation first with my mother and then with both parents about college and sexuality. my father surprised me by taking a less accepting viewpoint than i always assumed he would take. surprisingly also my mother took up my side. interesting. frustrating at the time, actually, but interesting. are parents obligated to accept their children’s decisions by a certain age? what difference is there between accepting and supporting? what’s a parent’s role by the time a kid gets to college: to offer guidance and advice because kids aren’t able to make intelligent, informed, mature choices until 32? or to generally acclimate themselves to the idea that kids are independent people who are going to make choices now that are, in their minds, not only intelligent, informed, and mature, but the only course of action?

apparently parents view this differently than their college-age children. who knew?

the conversation made me realize a number of things. first off, i’m lucky. i’m in a conventional, superficially-acceptable relationship (i.e.: w/ a jewish male, and one who isn’t a rock band drummer at that.) second, many attitudes that swatties are swift to write off as bigoted exist in smart, non-republican parents and probably in the vast majority of the world. it’s humbling.

tired. sleep. good luck to those of you who need it and a lot of admiration for those of you who have to face these kinds of things much more extensively and consistently than i do.